Legal Opinion

Genesee Lumber & Coal Co. v. Bonarrigo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 5, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We are of the opinion that the purpose and effect of the amendment to subdivision 4 of section 9 of the Lien Law, made by chapter 507 of the Laws of 1916, was to limit the extent of a hen to the agreed price or value of labor actually performed or materials actually furnished at the time of filing the notice, excepting only materials actuahy manufactured for but not delivered to the real property. The object of the notice has always been “ to advise those who may have a legal interest in the subject of the character and extent of the demand upon which the claim to a Hen is based.” (Toop v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toop v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Goldberger-Raabin, Inc. v. 74 Second Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Pascual v. Greenleaf Park Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. L. A. Storch & Co. v. Marginal Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1919
  5. J. V. Vrooman Sons Co. v. PierceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fortune v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. Delaware Towers, Inc. v. Siegfried Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Dwelle-Kaiser Co. v. MoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. In re Vantine's Retail Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API