Legal Opinion

Bailey-Ball-Pumphrey Co. v. German

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, P. J.

Plaintiff is a cotton factor in Memphis, Tennessee, and brought this suit to recover an advancement and expenses on cotton consigned to it by defendant. Defendant filed a counterclaim for damages for failure of plaintiff to sell the cotton as directed. Trial by jury and verdict against plaintiff on its cause of action and in favor of defendant on his counterclaim for $750. Plaintiff appealed.

Defendant is a farmer in Pemiscot County and on January 12, 1920, a solicitor of plaintiff induced him to ship ten bales of cotton to plaintiff at Memphis, Tenn., to be sold on commission. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Newburger-Morris Co. v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Joseph P. Murphy Co.'s Assigned EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Balderston v. National Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1893
  4. Dolan v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moon Distributing Co. v. MarableMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Boatmen's Bank v. ClarahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API