Legal Opinion
Allied International Development, Ltd. v. Barson Composite Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant Terrill E. Barnard was a party to a September 12, 2000, agreement entitled “Production Facility Addition Revision 2 Phase One and Partial Phase Two,” and, in effect, is required to participate in an arbitration proceeding before the American Arbitration Association, the plaintiff appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated October 21, 2002, as denied those branches of its motion which were for a judgment declaring, among other things, that the defendant Terrill E. Barnard…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- In re the Arbitration between Waldron & GoddessNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brandes Meat Corp. v. CromerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Mail & Express Co. v. Parker Axles, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Skyline Enterprises of N. Y. Corp. v. Amuram Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fotiadis v. FotiadisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Schneider v. SchneiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Brodie v. Global Asset Recovery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004