Legal Opinion

Goytia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1972No. S. F. 22854PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Rupert A. Pedrin, Jon L. Gateley and Kevin R. Twohy for Respondents.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

This workmen’s compensation claim is before our court for a second time. (Goytia v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (1970) Cal.3d 889 [83 Cal.Rptr. 591, 464 P.2d 47].) On the initial appeal, we held that in determining an employee’s “earning capacity” for purposes of computing his “average weekly earnings” under Labor Code section 4453, subdivision (d), 1 the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board is required to give “due consideration” to an applicant’s post-injury earnings insofar as such earnings shed light on the applicant’s earning capacity at the time of his injury. Since the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Argonaut Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Goytia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Jeffares v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Van Voorhis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Pascoe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Thrifty Drug Stores, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Meredith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. City of Anaheim v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API