Legal Opinion
City of Anaheim v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1982No. Civ. 25688PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
The City of Anaheim (city), legally uninsured, seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) denying city’s petition for reconsideration and, in effect, determining that during the period January 1, 1975, to March 27, 1979, Fred G. Davis (the applicant), employed by the city as a police detective, suffered an industrial injury “consisting of colitis.” City contends that the applicant’s colitis, which manifests itself in recurrent episodes of acute illness and disability, did not develop or arise during the period January 1, 1975, to March 27,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goytia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Raischell & Cottrell, Inc. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Goytia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Padilla v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Hollywood Refrigeration Sales Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Fairview State Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.