Legal Opinion

Price v. Century Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1939No. Appeal, 324PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

This is a suit on a “hold-up” insurance policy. Plaintiff is an itinerant jewelry merchant. He claims that while traveling alone in an automobile with his merchandise he was forced off the road by three persons and a part of his stock in trade was taken from him.

Defendant company offered four defenses to the action : first, that the robbery did not occur, second, that at least it was not established by “reasonable evidence” as required by the policy, third, that, in violation of the policy, plaintiff was. not accompanied by a guard, and fourth, that plaintiff did…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Western & A. Pipe Lines v. Home Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1891
  2. Home Ins. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
  3. Joseph Gordon, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Short v. Allegheny Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Weinstein v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Georgian House of Interiors, Inc. v. Glens Falls InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Diesinger v. American & Foreign Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  3. Rittenhouse Foundation, Inc. v. Lloyd's LondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Mullen v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Sirhan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API