Mullen v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Rhodes, J.,
Opinion by
Plaintiff as beneficiary brought this action in assumpsit on two policies of insurance issued by the defendant on the life of her son. The jury found for plaintiff for the amount of the policies plus interest. Defendant’s motions for judgment n.o.y. and a new trial were overruled. This appeal is by defendant from the judgment entered on the verdict.
We are of the opinion that defendant’s point for binding instructions should have been affirmed. Admissions in the pleadings offered in evidence establish facts which avoided the policies without the intervention of a jury…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Prevete v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Youngblood v. Prud. Ins. Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Applebaum v. Empire State Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Connell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hogan v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Pavia v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- McInerney v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Caterbone v. Lititz Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1959