Legal Opinion
New Milford Savings Bank v. Zandy, No. Cv 99 00787 66 (Nov. 23, 1999)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided November 23, 1999No. CV 99 00787 66Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
RULING RE: MOTION TO STRIKE
By motion dated May 26, 1999, the plaintiff moves to strike the four special defenses to the complaint. The motion was argued on October 18, 1999. The plaintiff claims that all four defenses are legally insufficient in this foreclosure action.
Practice Book § 10-39 provides in pertinent part, "[w]henever any party wishes to contest . . . the legal sufficiency of any answer to any complaint, counterclaim or cross-complaint, or any part of that answer including any special defense contained…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Nowak v. NowakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Connecticut National Bank v. DouglasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Moore v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.