Legal Opinion
Lundstrom v. Young
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 9, 2024No. 3:18-cv-02856Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN LUNDSTROM, Case No.: 18-cv-2856-GPC-MSB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 CARLA YOUNG, an individual; LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; 15 [ECF No. 215, 216–217, 219, 229, 232, LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALs, INC. 242] 16 401(k) PLAN; KOONSFULLER, PC and DOES 1 through 20, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants 20 Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Ligand”) and Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 401(K) Plan 21 (“the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.