Legal Opinion

New Jersey Insurance v. Rowell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1925No. 16066PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bloodwortii, ,T.

Bowell brought suit against the New Jersey Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, on an insurance policy, for the amount thereof, and in addition asked for damages and attorney’s fees. On the trial the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount of the policy, but denied a recovery of damages and attorney’s fees. To the judgment for the amount of the policy the defendant excepted. We will discuss only subdivisions a and b of the 2d headnote.

It is insisted that the policy sued upon is void because “a part of the premium was paid by the exchange of or credit…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. BabcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Mechanics & Traders Insurance v. Mutual Real Estate & Blg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Hoffman v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Home Insurance v. AdlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Michigan Pipe Co. v. Michigan Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newark Fire Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Electric City Lumber Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Turner v. Supreme Lodge Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Ætna Insurance v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Williford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API