Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 13, 1932No. 391Published
1Opinion of the Court
60 F.2d 109 (1932)
ROGERS
v.
HILL et al.
SAME
v.
TAYLOR et al.
No. 391.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 13, 1932.
Chadbourne, Stanchfield & Levy, of New York City (Nathan L. Miller, Victor J. Dowling, George W. Whiteside, and J. Arthur Leve, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellants Hill, Neiley, Riggio, Taylor, and American Tobacco Co.
Richard Reid Rogers, of New York City, pro se.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellee is the owner of 200 shares of common and 400 shares of common B stock, and seeks a decree declaring article XII of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Zwolanek v. Baker Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Kavanaugh v. . Commonwealth Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- United States Steel Corp. v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Young v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Putnam v. Juvenile Shoe CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.