Legal Opinion
Abdur-Raheem v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of petitioner at the Tier III hearing constitute substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner violated inmate rules 102.10 and 113.23 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [3] [i]; [14] [xiv]; see, Matter of Bryant v Coughlin, 77 NY2d 642, 647; Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 NY2d 615, 616; People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139).
The determination…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Perez v. WilmotNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bryant v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Brooks v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Collins v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farid v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002