Legal Opinion

Midland National Bank v. Hegna

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1923No. 5,292PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fergus County; Rudolf Von Tobel, Judge. Action by the Midland National Bank of Minneapolis against T. E. Hegna. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

This is an action brought by the plaintiff bank to recover from the defendant $3,000 and interest upon a promissory note executed September 2, 1921, to the E. L. Welch Company, which note it is alleged was indorsed and delivered before maturity, in due course, to the plaintiff. Upon issue joined by answer and reply the case was tried before a jury. Judgment appears to have been entered in favor of the plaintiff as prayed upon a directed verdict: The appeal is from the judgment.

The defendant’s assignments of error are as follows:

“(1) The court erred in granting respondent’s motion to [1] place…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Roosevelt CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bohon v. Bitter Root Sales Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Putnam v. DoneyMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Smith v. RodriguezMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Miners Nat. Bank v. ProulxMontana Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API