Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Doney

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1927No. 6,014PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

This action involves the ownership of certain oil royalties in land located in Toole county. The cause was tried before the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff, from which the defendant has appealed.

The respondent filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, but under the condition of the record in the case we have concluded to overrule this motion pro forma, and it is so ordered.

Pages 16 to 96 of the transcript filed in this court contain what purports to be a recital of the proceedings had at the trial, including the testimony introduced thereat, but no bill of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bitter Root Irrigation District v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Midland National Bank v. HegnaMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Montana Mausoleum Co. v. FavaMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Deschamps v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RuonaMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Miners Nat. Bank v. ProulxMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State v. RuonaMontana Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API