Legal Opinion

Gross v. Cuneo Press, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 14, 1929No. Gen. No. 32,971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barnes

The action below was to recover for personal injuries. The declaration charged negligence in the operation of defendant’s motor truck whereby plaintiff was struck and injured, and wanton and wilful negligence of defendant’s employee. Defendant filed a plea of general issue, and later, by leave of court, a plea alleging that at the time of the injury plaintiff was in the employ of the Chicago Surface Lines, which employer was working under and bound by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Cahill’s St. ch. 48, fí 201 et seq.; that defendant and its agents were also working under said statute, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Cox v. United States Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. St. Louis O'fal. Coal Co. v. Indus. Com.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rehula v. BessertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  2. Huntoon v. PritchardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  3. Calvert v. Illinois Power & Light Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. Cipperly v. CarmackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. Will v. 1527-31 Wicker Park Avenue Building Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API