Legal Opinion
Zucker v. Vogt
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 19, 1961No. Civ. 8818PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
Ruling On Motion To Dismiss
The question raised by the defendant’s motion to dismiss is whether the plaintiff has stated a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6) F.R. Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. For the purposes of this motion, the allegations, as set forth below, must be taken as true. Schustack v. Herren, (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1955), 136 F. Supp. 850.
The defendant in violation of the provisions of the Connecticut Dram Shop Act, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 30-102 (Rev. of 1958) 1 sold alcoholic liquor to one William Baker, Jr., a patron of the defendant’s restaurant at…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bernhard v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Rong Yao Zhou v. Jennifer Mall Restaurant, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Colligan v. CousarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
- Pardey v. Boulevard Billiard ClubSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
- Lillian Zucker, Adm'x, Estate of Marvin Jerome Zucker v. Hugo Vogt, D/B/A Hugo's RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.