Legal Opinion

Leverty & Hurley Co. v. City of Danbury

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 3, 1939No. File 54231PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinlan, J.

The plaintiff is a contracting company of the City of Bridgeport, and the action is set forth in two counts: first, under the terms of the contract, Exhibit A, for the resurfacing of asphalt pavement on Main Street in Danbury, at agreed unit prices; and second, for the reasonable value of the materials furnished.

The defendant resists this action by setting forth the noncompliance by the city with a number of provisions of the special laws governing the conduct of affairs of the City of Danbury — for instance, that there was no advertising of bids, no certification of an appropriation by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vito v. Town of SimsburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  2. Jones v. Town of MarlboroughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Royal School Laboratories, Inc. v. Town of WatertownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. Royal School Laboratories, Inc. v. Town of WatertownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965
  3. Royal School Laboratories, Inc. v. Town of Watertown and Classen P. Perkins, Town of Watertown v. New England Merchants National Bank of Boston and Royal School Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API