Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided September 30, 1994No. 93-30031-RVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

VINSON, District Judge.

Pending is the motion of defendants Ford Motor Co., Ford Leasing Development Co., and Fort Walton Beach Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. for summary judgment on all counts of the amended complaint, (doc. 73). Also pending is the plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment on Counts I and X of the amended complaint, (doe. 71). The plaintiff seeks a declaration that he is an automobile dealer pursuant to the federal and Florida Automobile Dealers’ Day in Court Acts. Defendant Ford Motor Credit Co. has moved for summary judgment on all counts of the amended complaint on…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Larkin v. Town of West HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
  3. Pearson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Bahig F. Bishay v. American Isuzu Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Salem Mall Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API