Legal Opinion

Karellas v. Karellas

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 11, 2002No. 99-P-1324PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoereer, J.

This an appeal from an order of a judge of the Probate and Family Court that the husband, Nicholas Karellas, pay interest on an amount awarded to the wife in a divorce judgment. The husband argues that his delay in failing to pay the judgment should have been enforced by a complaint for contempt and that interest could only be awarded as a remedy for contempt. We disagree and hold that the judgment bore interest from the date of its entry.

*470Facts. This was not an amicable divorce. The parties fought bitterly over several years and on many fronts in both the Probate and Family Court and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Patry v. Liberty Mobilehome Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Cherry v. CherryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. New England Factors, Inc. v. GenstilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Hobbs v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Boyer v. BowlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re AubeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. Poras v. PaulingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Karellas v. KarellasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. Fronk v. FowlerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  5. Bernier v. BernierMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API