Legal Opinion

In re Kaminsky

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Habeas corpus case. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Petitioner, having been found to be the father of an illegitimate child, was ordered to pay certain money for its support, and to give bond to the superintendents of the poor of Wayne county to indemnify them against the infant’s becoming a charge on the county. The order further required him to be imprisoned in the House of Correction of Detroit till he should give such bond or be legally discharged. This confinement is claimed to be illegal.

The House of Correction is a prison for the confinement of persons convicted of offenses. No one can be received into it except in pursuance of some…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bowerman v. MacDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Artibee v. Cheboygan Circuit JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. KaminskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API