Legal Opinion

Phaire v. Galiber-Babb

Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands

Decided June 26, 1991No. Civil No. 734/90PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEltman, Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this action for legal malpractice, the defendant moves for summary judgment on the grounds that the claim is barred by the passage of the two-year statute of limitations. 5 V.I.C. § 31(5)(A). The motion will be granted.

FACTS

In 1986, the plaintiff, Rosa Julia Gonzalez Phaire, a/k/a Rosita Phaire (“Phaire”) retained the defendant Lucia A. Galiber-Babb, Esq. (“Galiber-Babb”), to represent her in a partition action which Phaire’s ex-husband had brought in connection with Plot 139 Sion Farm. (Terr. Ct. Civil No. 327/88).

As recited by the Appellate Division of the District…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Simmons v. OceanDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1982
  3. Moorehead v. MillerDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1984
  4. Ingvoldstad v. Estate of YoungDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1982
  5. Phaire v. PhaireDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whitaker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API