Legal Opinion
Ingvoldstad v. Estate of Young
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided May 13, 1982No. Civil No. 80-262PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Defendants have moved to dismiss the above captioned case on the grounds that it is barred by the V.I. six-year statute of limitations for actions on an express or implied contract, 5 V.I.C. § 31(3)(A), as well as by the general tort two-year statute in 5 V.I.C. § 31(5)(A). Plaintiff opposed the motion by arguing that the action is timely because the appropriate statute of limitations is the 10-year statute for a cause of action not otherwise provided for in § 31.1 Alternatively, plaintiff argued that the six-year statute for contract actions is applicable and that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Associated Hardware Supply Co. v. The Big Wheel Distributing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Citizens State Bank of Dickinson v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Reynolds v. Whitin MacH. WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Victor M. Francois v. A. Jane Francois, George H. Adams and William H. Dick, D/B/A Ad'm Enterprises, a Limited Partnership. Appeal of A. Jane FrancoisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arlington Funding Services, Inc. v. GeigelSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
- Charles Gomez v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Department of Public Safety & Police Benevolent AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Fountain Valley Corp. v. WellsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1983
- Lawaetz v. Bank of Nova ScotiaDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1987
- Simmons v. OceanDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.