Legal Opinion

Wickersham v. Irwin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the District Court of Allegheny county. This was an action of covenant, brought by Irwin and wife against Thomas Wickersham, to recover $569.33, being the amount of four years’ ground-rent, from October 1, 1844, to October 1, 1848, charged upon a lot in Pittsburgh.

Read the full summary

Error to the District Court of Allegheny county. This was an action of covenant, brought by Irwin and wife against Thomas Wickersham, to recover $569.33, being the amount of four years’ ground-rent, from October 1, 1844, to October 1, 1848, charged upon a lot in Pittsburgh. The wife of Irwin claimed to be heir and devisee of Ewalt, who, by indenture of perpetual lease, dated March 9, 1813, conveyed part of the lot above referred to, to Isaac Wickersham, subject to an annual rent of f>142.33J, payable in half-yearly instalments. The title of Isaac Wickersham to the lot, under the lease, was…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rogers, J.

— This is an action of covenant to recover the arrears of ground-rent, due on an indenture of perpetual lease, by which Samuel Ewalt, deceased, conveyed part of lot 179, in the city of Pittsburgh, to Isaac Wickersham, subject to an annual rent, &c., payable in half-yearly instalments, to the said Ewalt, his heirs and assigns. The defendant, Thomas Wickersham, who was the assignee of the premises, among other matters, pleaded in bar of the action, that he had transferred and assigned over his interest, before any rent became due. On this,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ottman, Trustees v. Albert Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. McClaren v. Citizens' Oil & Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Medical Arts Bldg. Co. v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API