Legal Opinion

Harbison-Walker Refractories Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 22, 1965No. 14827_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

On appeal, this suit for income tax refund for the taxable years 1951 and 1952 presents the single question whether the high-silica conglomerate, which the taxpayer extracts from one of its quarries and uses in the manufacture of refractories, qualifies for a 15 per cent depletion deduction as “quartzite” within the meaning of that term in subsection 114(b) (4) (A) (iii) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, as amended in 1951, rather than a 5 per cent depletion deduction which subsection 114(b) (4) (A) (i) grants for “sand, gravel” or “stone”. 1

In South Jersey Sand Co.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. South Jersey Sand Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Quartzite Stone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  3. Standard Realization Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  4. United States v. W. R. Bonsal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  5. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bloomington Limestone Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API