Legal Opinion

Bloomington Limestone Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 13, 1971No. 18715_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns the correct method of computing the gross income from mining of taxpayer, an integrated miner-manufacturer of limestone products, for depletion allowance purposes. Because the taxpayer in the taxable years sold only a small quantity of rough block limestone from its mines and shipped the rest to its mills for fabrication processing, it must compute its mining income “constructively” according to Treasury Regulation § 1.613-3 and its predecessor. The district court, 315 F.Supp. 1255, found that the taxpayer had established “representative market or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Alabama By-Products Corporation v. George D. Patterson, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. Henderson Clay ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Virginian Limestone Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  5. South Jersey Sand Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  2. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  3. Warner Company, in No. 73-1722 v. United States of America, in No. 73-1723Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. Exxon Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  5. Glickler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API