Legal Opinion
Mau v. Hollywood Commercial Buildings, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 1, 1961No. Civ. 24892PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in respondent’s favor after a trial upon appellant’s amended complaint for damages based upon six causes of action. The litigation arose primarily out of the landlord-tenant relationship between appellant lessor and respondent lessee.
A résumé of the situation is as follows:
On February 6, 1958, appellant (plaintiff) served a “Three Days’ Notice” to quit upon respondent tenant. On July 1, 1958, appellant filed her “Complaint for Unlawful Detainer” alleging three causes of action.
The first cause of action alleged that respondent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Edgett v. FairchildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Dyer v. KnueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Rose v. HechtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. Selma Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Highland Plastics, Inc. v. EndersAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
- Costa v. A. S. Upson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Kasunich v. KraftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Gong v. Firemen's InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.