Keiko Larez, and v. William Holcomb, and Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
16 F.3d 1513
Keiko LAREZ, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant,
v.
William HOLCOMB, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 91-55822, 91-56145, 91-56283 and 91-56284.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 5, 1993.
Decided Feb. 22, 1994.
Marion R. Yagman and Stephen Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, California, for the plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.
Richard M. Helgeson, Assistant City Attorney, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellant-cross-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Before:…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Pregerson; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Leavy.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Larez v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Golden Eagle Distributing Corporation v. Burroughs Corporation, and Kirkland & EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.