Legal Opinion

State v. Pepin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 1, 2007No. 2006-458PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

Following a trial on stipulated facts in the Superior Court (Barry, J.), the defendant, Ernest P. Pepin, appeals his conviction for operating a motor vehicle after having been certified as a habitual offender. See RSA 262:23 (2004) (amended 2006). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress. We reverse and remand.

The trial court found the following: The defendant was stopped shortly after midnight on October 6, 2005, by Officer Eric Desmarais of the Manchester Police Department who heard the tires of the defendant’s vehicle “squeal.”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. Singleton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  3. State v. McKinnon-AndrewsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. State v. GubitosiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. State v. BeauchesneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RutterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. State v. FarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  3. State v. JoyceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  4. State v. SteevesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. Burnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API