State v. Varnell
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Jess James Varnell appeals the trial court’s decision granting his request to terminate his drug court participation.1 He now contends that (1) the trial court terminated his drug court participation without due *927process of law and (2) his counsel acted outside the scope of his authority when he told the trial court that Varnell wished to waive any rights he might have to a termination hearing. We hold that Varnell’s unilateral termination of his drug court participation was fully in accord with the drug court agreement and does not implicate due process concerns. Finding no error, we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re the Personal Restraint of JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MarinoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. Cassill-SkiltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Jason M. HirockeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington, V Linda Kay HarperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State of Washington v. Jason M. HirockeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021