Legal Opinion

Ralston Purina Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 4, 1976No. 75-1015PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the judgment of a three-judge District Court setting aside and annulling a decision and order of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. United States, 397 F. Supp. 607 (WD Ky. 1975).

In 1973, the railroads in southern territory, which lies south of the Ohio River and east of the Mississippi, proposed new tariffs changing the method of calculating the through rates on vegetable oil, cake or meal, and related articles, which were subject to transit privileges at various points where animal, fish, and poultry feed using these ingredients was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1975

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. The Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  2. Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Curtis, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, and Story, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  4. Frank J. Laird v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, the Kansas City Southern Railway Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. State of Texas v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API