Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BRATCHER, District Judge.
This is an action by several railroad companies seeking judicial review of a report and order of the Interstate Commerce Commission which found that plaintiffs had not shown a proposed modification of arrangements for the transit of vegetable oil, cake or meal was just and reasonable. Plaintiffs ask this Court to set aside the report and declare that the modification of the transit agreement is just, reasonable, and therefore valid. This Court’s jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to § 17(9) of the Interstate Commerce Act (hereinafter the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State of Florida v. United States Brooks-Scanlon Corporation v. Same. Wilson Lumber Co. Of Florida v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Board of Trade of Kansas City v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1976