Borough of Sayreville v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentHehek, J.
As the Chief Justice says, the basic inquiry here has to do with the meaning of L. 1947, c. 178, entitled “An Act concerning the elimination of grade and other crossings of railroad tracks and highways, amending sections 48:12-62, 48:12-70, 48:12-71, 48:12-77 and supplementing chapter twelve of Title 48 of the Eevised Statutes.”
The immediate question is whether the cost of constructing a new fireproof bridge to replace the existing “Deep Cut Bridge” built in 1831 or thereabouts over the railroad’s right of way across Washington Eoad in Sayreville, and reconstructed in 1901, is apportionable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- District of Columbia v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Costanzo v. TillinghastSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.