Legal Opinion
Bussell v. Dannenberg Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 17, 1925No. 16570PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
'Under the allegations of the petition the plaintiff’s injuries were not occasioned by the act of a fellow servant. It is alleged that Collins was the defendant’s general manager, and there is nothing to indicate that he did not have the general authority which would ordinarily be implied from such title. As was said by the Supreme Court in Raleigh &c. R. Co. v. Pullman Co., 122 Ga. 706 (50 S. E. 945) : “The terms ‘general manager’ are words of large meaning. In and of themselves they imply duties and responsibilities which would devolve upon a person…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Dunn v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Daniel v. Excelsior Auto Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frazier v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Echols v. Chattooga Mercantile CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Planters Cotton-Oil Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Borochoff v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Reid v. Lummus Cotton-Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.