Planters Cotton-Oil Co. v. Baker
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bussell, Chief Justice.
The first question must be answered in the negative. Sections 3603 and 4413, being in pari materia, must be construed together. Each is supplemental of the other. Consequently there should not “be made any distinction between the relationships of principal and agent and that of master and servant, so as to make different rules of liability apply according to the nature of the relationship.” Section 4413 is not contrary to section 3603, because section 3603 properly construed does not mean that the principal is not liable for the wilful trespass of *163his agent unless done…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Savannah Electric Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Gasway v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Greeson v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Southern Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Frazier v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Melton v. LaCalamitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Walker v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.