Morehead v. Doe
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1DissentAnderson, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
The majority opinion misconstrues S.C.Code Ann. § 38-77-170 (Supp.1995). Moreover, I disagree with the factual recitation of the majority. Manifestly, a review of the law reveals apodictically that the former rigid statutory provision was replaced with an elastic requirement of notice within a reasonable time. The majority fails to recognize the evolvement in the law. Concomitantly, I will address the issue with specificity-
On July 21, 1989, Leca Morehead and her son were travel-ling in a vehicle driven by her husband when they were involved in a near collision.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Daisy Outdoor Advertising Co. v. AbbottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- King v. PYA/Monarch, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Ateyeh v. Volkswagen of Florence, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Meehan v. Commerical Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.