Legal Opinion · Dissent

Morehead v. Doe

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 4, 1996No. 2584Published

1DissentAnderson, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The majority opinion misconstrues S.C.Code Ann. § 38-77-170 (Supp.1995). Moreover, I disagree with the factual recitation of the majority. Manifestly, a review of the law reveals apodictically that the former rigid statutory provision was replaced with an elastic requirement of notice within a reasonable time. The majority fails to recognize the evolvement in the law. Concomitantly, I will address the issue with specificity-

On July 21, 1989, Leca Morehead and her son were travel-ling in a vehicle driven by her husband when they were involved in a near collision.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Daisy Outdoor Advertising Co. v. AbbottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. King v. PYA/Monarch, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Ateyeh v. Volkswagen of Florence, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Meehan v. Commerical Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API