Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by the Cheatham Electric Switching Device Company' against the Transit Development Company, Nassau Electric Railroad Company, and American Automatic Switch Company.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIELD, District Judge.
The complainant has brought on various motions in the present action, which have been argued together, but which must be considered separately.
The present action is that in which the American Automatic Switch Company was released as a party defendant, upon the determination of a plea' interposed by it (Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co. et al. [C. C.] 191 Fed. 727), and in which a temporary injunction, was granted against the use of the device referred to throughout these papers as Type 14, which had been the basis of a preceding action…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1911
- Transit Development Co. v. Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Brooklyn Rapid Transit Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1915
- Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Brooklyn Rapid Transit Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1915
- Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1915