Legal Opinion

Himmelreich v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 25, 2019No. 4:10-cv-02404Unknown

1Opinion

PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION WALTER J. HIMMELREICH, ) ) CASE NO. 4:10CV2404 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ef al, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendants. ) ORDER [Resolving ECF No. 142] Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 142). Plaintiff responded in opposition (ECF Nos. 156, 157),' and Defendants replied (ECF Nos. 163, 164).’ Having reviewed the record and the applicable law the Court determines that oral argument is not needed. For the reasons stated herein, the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API