Legal Opinion

United States v. Kerry Johansen, Michael Johansen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1996No. 95-3996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

In the early 1960s, the federal government purchased easements on the farmland tracts of Kerry Johansen and Michael Johansen (the Johansens) for the maintenance of waterfowl production areas. After two unusually wet years in North Dakota, the Johansens requested the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to delineate the extent of its wetland easements. The FWS refused, arguing that any wetlands that develop during wet years are subject to the easements’ restrictions. Nevertheless, the Johansens proceeded to drain portions of their farmland tracts to contain the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. North Dakota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Schulz v. HauckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rudy Webb v. Exxon Mobil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. Act, Inc. v. Sylvan Learning Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Kevin Jay MastCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Kevin MastCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API