Legal Opinion
Angelina Holly Corp. v. Clark
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-1212PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JUNE L. GREEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Statement of Facts
The facts in this action are undisputed. At issue here is the defendants’ rejection of plaintiff Angelina Holly Corporation’s (“Angelina Holly”) offers for certain noncompetitive oil and gas leases. As authorized by the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (“the Leasing Act”), 30 U.S.C. § 181 et seq., 1 the Secretary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Duesing v. UdallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Charles Schraier v. Walter J. Hickel, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- James W. Haley v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation v. Robert F. Burford, Mountain States Legal Foundation (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Justheim Petroleum Company v. The Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- National Wildlife Federation v. Robert F. Burford, Mountain States Legal Foundation (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987