Townsend v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Clarence Bateil Townsend appeals his conviction for public indeceney,1 a Class A misdemeanor, contending that the evi-denee was insufficient to support his conviction because, while there was circumstantial evidence that he urinated in a public place, there was neither evidence nor reasonable inference that he showed his penis while doing so. We agree and reverse Townsend's conviction.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 23, 2000, at approximately 8:80 pm., South Bend Police Officer Scott Bryant observed Townsend walking down the street with his knees held closely together.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thompson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Marshall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Whatley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Griffith v. LintonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Glotzbach v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Derrick Morris v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Townsend v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001