Reynolds v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
There are several links in the long chain that brings this case to us. The first—and certainly not the least—is when members of the family of Frederick William Reynolds, Jr., confronted him, late in the spring of 1989, with dark secrets two of his adult daughters had just shared with them. For years, according to the women, Reynolds had sexually abused them at the family farm in Carroll County when they were children; one he had repeatedly raped throughout her youth and into her adolescence. Now in his 50s with the girls grown, Reynolds was no longer engaged in criminally…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Burch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Winder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.