Legal Opinion

Cashmere Valley Bank v. Dep't of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2014No. 89367-5Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILE IN CLERK'S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON / DATE_j_~P 2 5 2014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CASHMERE VALLEY BANK, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 89367-5 ) v. ) En Bane ) STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ) Filed SEP 2 5 2014 ) Respondent. ) ) WIGGINS, J.-This case turns on interpretation of a state tax deduction statute . . Farmer RCW 82.04.4292 (1980) provided that in computing their business anp . I occupation (B&O) tax, banks and financial institutions could deduct from their income "amounts derived from interest received on investments or loans…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. HomeStreet, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. American Best Food v. Alea LondonWashington Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API