Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Owens

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 2002No. 00-CO-1309Published

1ConcurrenceRuiz, Associate Judge

The requirements and purpose of the “knock and announce” statute are satisfied if, after knocking and announcing, and al*578lowing sufficient time for an occupant of the residence to open the door, police officers seeking to execute a search warrant reasonably believe that they have been denied entry. See D.C.Code § 23-524(a) (2001) (incorporating requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3109 that an officer be “refused admittance” after giving notice of authority and purpose). I agree with the majority’s analysis that the police could reasonably come to that conclusion on the facts of this case.

I also agree…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Bonner, United States of America v. James TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. Poole v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API