Legal Opinion

Poole v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1993No. 90-CF-1523, 92-CO-269, 92-CO-376, 91-CF-229 and 92-CO-363PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

A jury found each appellant guilty of one count of second-degree burglary while armed, eleven counts of armed robbery, three counts of assault with intent to rob while armed, and one count of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, based on evidence of appellants’ involvement in the January 25, 1990, robbery of hair stylists and their clients at a beauty salon on Pennsylvania Avenue, S.E. 1 See D.C.Code §§ 22-1801(b), -2901, -3202, - 501, & -3204(b) (1989 Repl. & 1993 Supp.). Both appellants challenge their convictions on a variety of grounds.

First,…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. KruegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hanna v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Stevenson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API