Stull v. Bellefonte Stone Products Corp.

Dissenting Opinion by

Montgomery, J.:

I cannot agree that the appellee Stull should recover in this case.

Although Bellefonte Stone Products Corporation early in 1953 advertised for someone primarily to invest more capital in the company, Stull, who responded to the advertisement, was able to secure a contract with the company whereby he became a stockholder, a creditor, and an employe. He loaned the company $15,000 at five per cent interest for a period of 21 months. In consideration therefor he took a judgment *44note whose due date was December 24, 1954. He secured employment as assistant to the…