Legal Opinion

Sherwood v. Boehm Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1931No. Appeal 114PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This is an action by a licensed real estate broker to recover from the sellers of real estate the commission which they had agreed to pay him if he secured a purchaser for the property.

Plaintiff’s evidence supported a finding that defendants agreed to pay him a commission of 5%, with a minimum of $200, if a purchaser was procured through his efforts; and that they did sell the property to a person introduced to them by plaintiff as an intending purchaser at a price $150 above the net amount which they had fixed as their selling price.

Defendants seek to avoid the payment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Everhart v. SearleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  2. Rice v. Davis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1890
  3. Cannell v. Smith, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891
  4. Sarshik v. FinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Mitchell v. SchreinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API