Legal Opinion

Bazinsky v. Conklin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 15, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burling, J.

This is a civil action sounding in tort, grounded in the alleged actionable negligence of the defendant, Nelson Conklin, in the operation of his automobile. The suit was instituted against him by Ida Bazinsky, Joseph Bazinsky and Morris Goldberg, plaintiffs, in the Law Division of the Essex County Court and, after a trial to court and jury, terminated in a verdict in favor of the defendant. The trial court, on motion for new trial, refused to disturb the verdict and judgment was entered thereon'. Upon plaintiffs’ subsequent appeal to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rapp v. PUBLIC SERVICE COORDINATED TRANSPORT, ETC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Sokol v. LiebsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Kovacs v. EverettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Ferdinand v. Agricultural, Etc., of Watertown, NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API