Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Chemtall Inc. v. Madden
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 2007No. 33380PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Opinion of the Court was delivered
2Per curiam
The petitioners and defendants below, suppliers and/or manufacturers of a chemical known as polyacrylamide, seek extraordinary relief to prevent the enforcement of two orders of the Circuit Court of Marshall County in an action brought by the respondents and plaintiffs below, current and former coal preparation plant workers, in which they seek medical monitoring for diseases they allegedly may develop in the future due to their exposure to polyacrylamide. For the reasons that follow, we deny the requested relief.1
I
PACTS
The respondents and plaintiffs…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hoover v. BergerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Philip Morris USA v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Chemtall Inc. v. MaddenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Perrine v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
- Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance v. Terri L. ColeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Perrine v. EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
- Perrine v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
- Perrine v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.