Legal Opinion

City of Murray v. Robinson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1994No. 930285Published

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Associate Chief Justice:

This case is here on certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals to review its ruling that petitioner Kaylin Robinson was not entitled to a publicly paid transcript of the trial proceedings in which she was convicted of driv*1152ing with a suspended driver’s license and ordered to pay a fine.1 Murray City v. Robinson, 848 P.2d 161, 162 (Utah Ct.App. 1993). Drawing on Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 37, 92 S.Ct. 2006, 2012-13, 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972), the court of appeals held that she was not entitled to such a transcript because there was no issue of whether she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Roberts v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Murray City v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API