Ricciardi v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,
This is an appeal from a decision by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) dis*318allowing a claim for compensation benefits by petitioner-claimant under .the unusual pathological result doctrine. We affirm.
On May 13, 1969 claimant was working as a cement mason at a construction site for his employer, Fleming Construction Co. As he was bending over to smooth the surface of a poured concrete slab he felt a “snap” in his back and a sharp pain. Claimant was unable to straighten up and had to be taken home. That same day he sought treatment, for his back…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Page's Department Store v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Malocheski v. Consolidated Cigar Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Arena v. Packaging Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Crucible Steel, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Modern Transfer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Lopresti v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.