Legal Opinion

Ricciardi v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1978No. Appeal, No. 494 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,

This is an appeal from a decision by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) dis*318allowing a claim for compensation benefits by petitioner-claimant under .the unusual pathological result doctrine. We affirm.

On May 13, 1969 claimant was working as a cement mason at a construction site for his employer, Fleming Construction Co. As he was bending over to smooth the surface of a poured concrete slab he felt a “snap” in his back and a sharp pain. Claimant was unable to straighten up and had to be taken home. That same day he sought treatment, for his back…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Page's Department Store v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Malocheski v. Consolidated Cigar Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Arena v. Packaging Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Crucible Steel, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Modern Transfer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Lopresti v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API